1. Quote 1: “I argued that the public schools had not been devised by
scheming capitalists to impose ‘social control’ on an unwilling proletariat or
to reproduce social inequality.” (page 6)
In this quote Ravitch is responding to a group of leftist historians in the 1970s who claim that the public education system is organized to intentionally maintain a socio-economic caste system and oppress the poor. I agree with Ravitch that public education is a system that has the ability to liberate the poor and the disenfranchised. However, it is clear that the education system is not succeeding at these goals. Schools in low-income areas are usually the lowest performing schools, making the quality of education worse in the schools where education can make the biggest difference. I do not believe the system is meant to intentionally keep poor people down, but we have allowed a system to exist that is failing to lift these people up.
Quote 2: “Testing had become a central preoccupation in the schools
and was not just a measure but an end in itself.” (page 12) This statement gets to the heart of the problem with high stakes testing in our education system today. Most people would agree that it is important to assess student and teacher performance, but the focus on testing has overwhelmed so many other important aspects of education. We have lost sight of cultivating student learners, especially whole learners, by replacing them with student performers. If we educate our citizens that the end goal is more important than the process, we are eroding a society of critical thinkers.
2. I think Ravitch hits the nail on the head in her description of a well-educated person. To expand on her description, I think a well-educated person who has the ability to think critically about any given problem using both skills and knowledge accumulated throughout life. A well-educated person has the ability to see multiple perspectives and does not accept the status quo without due consideration of all perspectives. A well-educated person is someone who is continually striving to grow their knowledge and understanding.
3. I enjoyed our class discussion of the first two chapters of Ravitch. The part of the discussion that stands out to me was when we talked about teacher assessment. There seemed to be consensus that there needs to be some way to measure teacher performance. However, I think there was also agreement that exclusively using the high stakes testing method is not the best way to assess. Many people in class suggested different methods of assessment, but I was most intrigued by what Matt and Greg shared about the evaluation process at De La Salle. A regular evaluation by a committee made up of people representing different parts of the school seems like a fair and reasonable method. Such a committee could be informed by student evaluations, peer evaluations, principal evaluations, and the teacher's own self evaluation, in addition to test scores. This method allows for various types of information and gives the teacher more substantive feedback for improvement in the future.
4. Gap: CA SS 11.7.2 Explain U.S. and Allied wartime strategy, including
the major battles of Midway, Normandy, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and the Battle of the
Bulge.
Resources
website - http://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plan/turning-tide-europe-1942-1944
book - Brute Force: Allied Strategy and Tactics in the Second World War by John Ellis
article - Allied Strategy in World War II: The Churchill Era, 1942-1943 by De Lamar Jensen
EDSITEment is a website hosted by We the People which is a program of the National Endowment for the Humanities. The website contains a plethora of lesson plans related to various periods of time in US History for teachers to use in their classroom. One EDSITEment lesson plan focuses specifically on the Allied strategies during World War Two. The lesson plan focuses on the agreement between the Allies to settle Europe by toppling Italy and Germany before they confront Japan. In their advancement on Europe, the Allies first decided to first attack Italy from north Africa, thinking that it would be the easiest of the Axis countries to defeat. From Italy, the Allies would move into the rest of Europe, overtaking Germany. Eventually, after Italy proved more difficult than originally thought, the Allies agreed to attack Germany from the west in France.
5. My Inquiry Question is: Would creating a thematic curriculum that replaces the traditional US History textbook with alternative resources create increased student engagement and learning?
One resource I found useful was a book called Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong by James Loewen. I read this book a few years ago and re-read portions of it as I began to consider my Inquiry Question. The book concludes that the traditional US History textbooks we use make the content boring and unappealing to students, and explores various reasons to explain why the textbooks are unsuccessful. This was an incredibly useful resource because it gave me a foundation for my research by providing a number of different avenues to pursue. Even more useful was that the book is very well sited and many of the references in the book are potential resources for my further exploration into the topic.
Another resource I found useful was an article from Educational Leadership called Out with Textbooks, In with Learning. This article focuses on the way that textbooks organize and provide information. The authors argue that textbooks are basically reference books that lack focus on big ideas and central concepts. This related to my interest in developing a theme based history class that I think will help students better engage with the content. Using themes or central concepts allows a student see progression and make connections, rather than have to decipher which facts from an avalanche of facts are important.
Comments
Yadira Zapata - http://unahistoriadeunamaestra.blogspot.com/
Mike Rose - http://Mikejas.blogspot.com/
Andrew Eckloff - http://aeckloff.blogspot.com/
Hi Troy,
ReplyDeleteI really think your inquiry question is very interesting and I like the idea of alternative resources. Sometimes when you are teaching from only a textbook, the students tend to tune out- using a book or program provides variation from the class norm that they are used to. Have you ever been to the Alameda Historical Museum? It might be a great field trip option!
I agree there has to be some way to measure teacher performance, just not through testing. Evalutations by peers, students and self-evaluations are all essential to create a real overall view of how a teacher can improve his or her strengths. Most of this kind of review is accomplished outside of the academic world and is one small way that a business model can be incorporated.
I really appreciate the second quote you chose from Ravtich along with the comments you made. I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment that for numerous reasons, we are not creating critical thinkers. My biggest pet peeve is when I announce there will be a quiz next week and the first question students ask is "Is it going to be multiple choice?" (which they very rarely are). It seems like all we are creating are students that can take mc tests, when there is no profession as a mc test-taker.
ReplyDeleteTroy,
ReplyDeleteI really think it is valuable endeavor to focus on thematic learning in contrast to textbook learning. When I look back at my own personal education is Social Science, I remember very little in high school, as most of my assignments were tied to reading chapters of minute facts and answering questions in the textbook at the end of each chapter.
It wasn't until college, when my US History professor began teaching history thematically, did I really feel the importance of history to my own life. Once students begin making connections and learning in themes, they start to understand that HISTORY ACTUALLY DOES REPEAT ITSELF!
Best of luck; keep it up.
-Alana
Troy-
ReplyDeleteI think it is a valuable and difficult feat to teach history thematically rather than chronologically. Yet, I do think that it will prove more applicable, valuable, and interesting to your students. I also think having taught the same subject this year with a textbook, that you will see quite a noticeable difference in the reaction of the class. I will be interested to find out about student reaction to the context once the book no longer plays a prominent role in the classroom setting.
Also, I agree with what you said in regards to Ravitch’s comments about a well-educated person. The one thing I think she left out was the application of the knowledge. I think she is right, a well-educated person would be able to teach another, but I also think that the well-educated person would be able to use their knowledge to think critically in problem solving situations. I also agree in regards to the status quo. For many of our students, the status quo seems to be more than enough. It is the well-educated person who does not accept the status quo as proficient and who continues to educated themselves based on a desire to learn.
I continue to wonder how the thematic curriculum will mix with a survey class. Do you have a measurement set up to evaluate which way is better for teh students? I do think that normal textbooks fail to address many issues, so hopefully a thematic approach will allow you to hit all the things the textbooks fail to bring out.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree with you more about high stakes testing. I agree with you and think that we are teaching for a goal and missing out on the entire process. I think that many students can "play the game" while they are in school and do enough to "pass the test" and reach the end goal but when they get into the real world they are lost because they have not learned the process. I am a huge history fan and love history related to WW II. I think your questions are great and that you have fascinating topic.
ReplyDeleteTroy, I totally agree with you on question 2. A well-educated person is a person that wants to continually know/understand more. As a teacher of Social Science I find that the students always want to avoid the deeper understanding by either giving short answers to problems or just saying “I do not know.” I find as an educator that we have to constantly push these students to elaborate and to begin that process of critically thinking and wanting to want to know more. So, I believe that Ravitch does do a good job of explaining what a well-educated person is and that as educators this should be our primary focus.
ReplyDeleteTroy,
ReplyDeleteHave you begun the process of choosing the themes you would use to organize a US history course? I'd be interested for you to share that in your blog entries as you begin to brainstorm. Also, will your themes be organized chronologically? If not, why not?
Thanks,
Molly